Is scientific exploration truly scientific if it ignores aspects simply because the scientist doesn't believe in them? Can you ignore possibilities unproven because they are incongruent with your own mores and ideas and still call yourself a scientist? Or must you include these ideas in your study with an open and impartial mind and disprove them or confirm them as the evidence presents itself?
Wednesday, September 13, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Be nice, people.